JURABISS: Journal of Agribusiness applies a strict and transparent review process to ensure the quality and credibility of published articles. The journal uses a double-blind peer review system in which both author and reviewer identities are concealed.

Submission and Initial Evaluation
All manuscripts submitted to JURABISS undergo initial screening by the editorial team to ensure compliance with the journal scope and guidelines. Manuscripts that pass this stage will be processed further.

Peer Review
Each eligible manuscript will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. Additional reviewers may be assigned if necessary.

Double-Blind Review
The identities of authors and reviewers are hidden to maintain fairness and objectivity.

Review Criteria
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on scientific quality, originality, relevance, clarity, and ethical compliance.

Review Duration
Reviewers are normally given about one month per review round.

Decision and Revision
Possible decisions include accepted, minor revision, major revision, or rejected. Authors must respond to reviewer comments before acceptance.

Editorial Decision
Final decision is made by the Editor in Chief or Editorial Board based on reviewer reports, originality, scope relevance, and ethical standards.

Confidentiality
All manuscripts are treated as confidential documents.

Process Improvement
JURABISS continuously improves its peer review process.

Contact
For questions, contact:
jurabiss@jurnaluningratpapua.ac.id